Texas Supreme Court hears arguments on mass mailing vote-by-mail applications

Members of the Texas Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday on the issue of mass mailing vote-by-mail applications.

In a high court Zoom meeting, Susan Hays, who was representing Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins, and Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins presented arguments for and against the county mailing out vote-by-mail applications.

"Fraudulent votes are not acceptable, but the act of giving someone an application does not increase fraud,” said Hays.



Hawkins's arguments were mostly based on procedure. "This action that Hollins contemplates is a serious affront to electoral integrity on the eve of a national election,” said Hawkins.

A social media post in late August triggered the court fight. In the post, Hollins announced he was going to mail every registered voter in that county a vote-by-mail application.

Hollins has been vocal about making it easy to vote. "The 2020 election is too important and the stakes are simply too high,” he said during a voter rally on September 10th.

RELATED: Federal judge blocks USPS changes that slowed mail ahead of 2020 election

RELATED: Concerned about COVID-19? A guide on how to vote by mail in Texas

Hollins has gone too far, according to Hawkins. "We have never seen, what we are seeing here, where applications to vote by mail are being sent in mass, hundreds of thousands, or even millions to people who have never asked for them and are probably not eligible to vote by mail,” he said.

The mailer from the clerk's office warns, in bold red letters, that not everyone who gets an application may be eligible to receive a ballot. Despite that, Hawkins warned someone could get a mail-in ballot by incorrectly claiming a disability. "There is the likelihood of voter confusion,” he said.

RELATED: Election officials, experts and USPS urging voters not to wait until state deadlines to mail in ballots

RELATED: Voting by mail: 9 states send ballots automatically, 35 allow COVID-19 as an excuse, 6 require other reason

In defense of the plan, Hays argued it would not cause confusion and is needed because of the outbreak of COVID-19. "Our election authorities around the state have a hard job in front of them, how to conduct an election in a manner that is safe,” she said.

Hays also argued her interpretation of state law that authorizes county clerks to "manage and conduct" early voting; allows for steps to reduce the risk of being exposed to a virus. "By increasing the ratio of voters who vote by mail, you decrease the bodies that come into the poll place,” she said.

RELATED: Ken Paxton files petition to Texas Supreme Court against mail-in voting

Hawkins countered, saying "manage and conduct" only applies to things like providing air conditioning and printers. "If Hollins' actions are allowed to process, it will fundamentally upset the balance of power between the state and the counties, that conception of power has existed for a century,” he said.

RELATED: USPS launches website providing resources and information on mail-in ballots ahead of 2020 election

Adding to the debate is that mail-in ballot applications have already gone out to people age 65 years and older, which is allowed by law. More than 200,000 in Harris County have been returned and processed. It was also pointed out state law allows private organizations to mass mail applications.

It’s unclear when the Court will issue a ruling.



FOX 7 Austin is working to keep you up to date with coronavirus, with both local and national developments. You can also get the latest COVID-19 news from around the country at coronavirusnow.com.